WebP to PNG
The compatibility fix, at the cost of a much larger file.
Convert your images
JPG and WebP only — PNG is always lossless.
No images yet. Add some to get started.
These files are processed locally. Nothing is uploaded.
What changes when you convert WebP to PNG
WebP is excellent on the web and awkward almost everywhere else. Desktop image editors, older versions of Office, some print workflows and a long tail of upload validators still do not recognise it. Converting to PNG is the fastest way to make the image usable in those places.
The output keeps the alpha channel, so transparent backgrounds survive the trip. That makes this a safe conversion for logos and cut-out graphics — nothing about the image changes except the container.
Expect the file to get considerably bigger. PNG stores every pixel losslessly and makes no attempt to approximate, so a WebP that was 300 KB can land in the multi-megabyte range. If the destination is a browser, there is no reason to do this at all.
Convert now
- Opening a downloaded WebP in a desktop image editor that does not support it
- Pasting an image into older Office or design software that rejects WebP
- Sending an image to a print service with a PNG-only requirement
- Passing an upload validator that only accepts PNG, JPG or GIF
WebP vs PNG
| WebP | PNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Compression | Lossless or lossy | Lossless |
| Transparency | Supported | Supported |
| Typical size | Small | 3-10x larger |
| Best for | Websites, apps | Editing, printing, uploads |
Other WebP conversions
Convert back
Frequently asked questions
Does the transparency survive?
Yes. Both WebP and PNG carry an alpha channel, so transparent areas are preserved exactly. This is the main reason to prefer PNG over JPG as the conversion target here.
Why is the PNG so much larger?
Because the two formats optimise for different goals. WebP was built to make files small for network transfer; PNG was built to store every pixel exactly. You are trading size for compatibility and lossless fidelity.
Will the image look any different?
No. The pixels are carried across unchanged. If the WebP was originally encoded in lossy mode, that earlier loss is already baked in, but this conversion adds nothing further.
Should I use PNG or JPG as the conversion target?
PNG if the image has transparency or if you will edit it further. JPG if it is a photograph with no transparency and file size matters more than fidelity.